15.2.10
Et tu, Cupid?
It is a totally commercialized holiday, fraught with expectation that has nothing to do with our actual desires. (Or everything to do with them, but all rolled into one artificial day.)
It's a stupid insult to single folk everywhere who are somehow made to feel inadequate even though everyone pretty much universally dislikes the holiday, except restaurateurs, who can charge a ridiculous price for a mediocre bottle of champagne and a fixe menu.
But it is certainly most insulting to otherwise happily married folk who would like to think that they are far beyond all petty show of romance, but who nonetheless find it stings incredibly to come up totally empty-handed on this most crass of days.
Aye. There's the rub.
Years ago I graciously let my husband off the hook for every holiday-related duty with the exception of the following three responsibilities: a card on my birthday, a card on my anniversary and a card on Valentine's Day.
Saying goodbye to gifts was not difficult. Money is tight, and Valentine's Day is superficial. I always hated the "office competition," where bouquet after overpriced bouquet of generic roses is delivered, each one providing a sort of stamp of approval for the recipient and leaving those with empty desks squirming. (Only I didn't squirm. I was fine opting out.)
But - - and let this be a lesson to women everywhere - - where has this lowering of expectation gotten me? Well, for the past several years, it has resulted in a need for constant reminders that such-and-such a date is approaching, and that a card is expected. (Wow. Romantic, huh?)
And this year, despite (annoying) reminders earlier in the week, it netted me zip.
We were quite busy this week and weekend, to be sure. But I ask you: If he can manage 300-odd sales employees, create breathtaking excel spreadsheets, and handle his big boy calendar chock full of business travel... why can't he manage this one small thing?
I can hear him grousing: "Why does it matter so much anyway? It's a stupid card, and a stupid day."
Why does it matter to me? He's a great dad. He's very loving, in the squeeze-my-rump-while-I'm-doing-the-dishes sort of way. He sometimes takes out the garbage without being told. He works hard and helps support us all. He even volunteers the occassional ice cream run when I'm having a craving.
That's a lovely list of attributes, and they add up to a guy I'm very grateful for. But the sad truth is that there's nothing romantic in my life, unless you count those damn Sookie Stackhouse novels. And I don't see a sexy, thousand-year-old vampire tapping on my window anytime soon.
And while I know my husband loves me a lot, he definitely doesn't say it enough, and not nearly in a flowery enough way. So it seems crazy to me that, efficient fellow that he generally is, he doesn't take advantage of the fact that Hallmark has basically done all the hard stuff for him. All he has to do is shell out the four bucks and read enough of the card to make sure it's not tastelessly humorous.
You know how guys feel about constantly being the only one to initiate sex? That's how I feel about romance. (You'd think he would see the obvious connection between those two things, but trust me, he doesn't.) I hate that I've been reduced to the kind of romantic peer pressure that only a national holiday can inflict.
And even that doesn't seem to be working.
13.2.10
Opening ceremonies: Nice job, hey?
Only, even the "restrained" budget still ran into the billions. For a couple hours of strangely fascinating entertainment to be sure. But still, it strikes me that the Olympic opening ceremonies could be considered a roaming economic stimulous package geared toward the creative/mentally-unbalanced. In what other situation do you get to say the following:
"Ummm, I know the Virtual Floor costs more than all the facilities we built to house the sporting events. But we need those spouting whales and splintering icebergs, damnit!"
[At open casting]: "NO! I want authentically crazy fiddlers and grundge tapdancers. We need to round up some actual street people, spend four years intensively training them in the performing arts, and then hope they don't bring heroin into the arena."
[After viewing early run through]: "It's CRAP!" [tears at hair dramatically] "The Native Peoples just aren't bringin' it. They're enthusiastic, but it's all just a bunch of drum banging. It's clearly lacking in power and emotion. Get me Bryan Adams."
12.2.10
Best winter olympic events ever
But aside from giving props to my friends from the north, I think the absolute best event ever in the Winter, or any Olympics really is sledding.
Yes, I'm talking the luge and bobsledding - the best Olympic events ever.
I mean, how totally cool is it that you take something as bizarre as sledding--think about it, you take a hunk of wood, wax the bottom of it, sit on top of it and fling yourself down a hill--and manage to get six, SIX, Olympic events out of it.
Keep your peepers on:
- Bobsleigh - Two man, Four man, Women's.
- Luge - Men's Singles, Women's Singles, and, um, yeah...Doubles.
Political poster boy for smut or sign of the times?
Or maybe this can only mean great strides forward for anyone who may have made some questionable decisions in their twenties. Maybe someday Ron Jeremy will be elected to the House of Representatives. After all, we have now broken the seal, so to speak.
It will start off slow. First Cosmo Boy in the Senate, then the Playmate of the Year becomes the Governor of California. Soon our School Boards will be filled with former strippers and a porn star will be Mayor of New York City.
So c’mon people, post those scandalous pictures on your Facebook wall and let your Freak Flag Fly!
If there is one thing that Sen. Brown teaches us, it is that there are no consequences for behaving badly. Now try telling your fifteen year-old that sending naked pictures to their boyfriend/girlfriend is a bad idea that could negatively impact their future. “How could you do something so stupid – are you trying to end up as a Senator!?”
Back in the day, scandalous pictures showed, at the very least, poor judgment. Leaving photographic evidence of one’s indiscretions was not only stupid but would limit, if not ruin, your career. So maybe this is a step forward? Suddenly the fact that someone in public office happens to be gay seems unimportant.
Thanks to new our newest contributor Mary for this scathing evaluation of men who take their clothes off for fun and fame.
11.2.10
A very special Duggar coming out story
10.2.10
Men who are actually sexier when they open their mouths and begin to speak
8.2.10
Old people are smothering the world
U.S. Representative John Murtha passed away today. Of course the primary reaction to this news was sadness and sympathy for his family. My secondary reaction, however, was a bit less charitable.
Murtha was 77 years old. And still serving in Congress. In a seat he has held since 1974 (the year after I, dear readers, was BORN). Are those big wooden chairs in the House of Representatives that comfy? I mean, last time I checked this was a democracy... not the friggin' House of Peers.
Murtha's antiquity made me curious, so I did a little research. (OK, totally superficial research... I clicked on a handful of websites and then grew bored with the idea of scientific accuracy.) Turns out, a whole lot of the people in Congress are old. And I mean really, really OLD.
And it's not just the public sector either. Check out the CEO's of prominent corporations. For that matter, check out the middle managers and even half of the peons that you, dear reader, work with today. Baby boomers are the plaque that is clogging the arteries of progress in this country.
Last time I checked, Social Security kicked in around 67. (65 if you were born before 1960, as the majority of our Congressmen were.) So, let me ask as nicely as I can:
Will. You. People. Please. RETIRE?!?
I know the stock market keeps messing with your savings, but unless you're prepared to work another 20 years (please, God, no); you might as well cut your losses and enjoy your remaining decade of full mobility.
Listen, I have great respect for my elders. I hope to be a vibrant, wise, active old lady one day. But in the meantime I have a career that's in neutral, a family to support on a mid-level salary that I'm quickly out-growing, and a retirement of my own to plan for.
We Gen Xers have gotten sort of a bad rap from the beginning. But if you really want to see a bunch of unmotivated, beligerent slackers, just park your asses smack dab in the middle of our future for another decade.
The (sexy) perks of fatherhood
(There are actually a handful of exceptions to this truth. Levi Johnston is an outstanding example. While he is young and handsome, he strikes me as an uncommitted, fairly irresponsible father. So his appeal is actually decreased by offspring.)
This should be very reassuring for men like my husband, who regularly bemoans the terrible toll his two offspring have taken on his youthful good looks.
Yes, my beloved now has a generous sprinkling of white in his formerly all-black hair. (There is also a notable decline in quantity of said hair. But I would never dwell on that.) His laugh lines have indeed deepened. His middle has broadened somewhat. And sometimes, after spending an entire weekend day entertaining the kids, he looks a tad haggard.
But he's also undeniably more attractive than he was before I married him and partook of his genetic material. And not just to me, I firmly believe. I catch more women than ever doing a double-take. And when he is out with the kids, it's almost as if female bystanders cannot help themselves! They strike up conversation on the flimsiest pretext; offer unsolicited help with my children; even brazenly flirt.
And I find myself having the same inexplicable reaction to other men with their kids, too. There is something so achingly sweet, so powerfully engaging, about a man in the role of father.
As gratifying as it is to have garnered my own special porn designation ("Milf." If you don't know what it means, ask any 14 year old boy.) ... it does strike me that the appeal of women is not universally enhanced by motherhood.
Another biologically-driven double standard.
Men demonstrate their virility and wham-o: We find them even more attractive. Women bear a child and mwah-mwah: Overnight we enter the un-sexiest club in the world.
4.2.10
Apocalypse preparedness training: Lesson #2
Women, it is utterly essential that we go into the post-apocalyptic period with clear priorities and firm resolve. Unless we want surviving generations to be useless (albeit attractive) morons incapable of creating a new world order, we need to adhere to the following foolproof guidelines for selecting reproductive partners.
1. Movie stars
I'm truly sorry ladies, but if all he has to offer are charm, good looks and dubious acting ability, he is off limits. George Clooney may possibly just barely be acceptable, assuming his quick wit (indicative of a desirable level of intelligence) exists in real life and not only in scripted situations.
The following males will be designated undesirable: Brad Pitt, Jude Law and Leonardo Dicaprio. Keanu Reeves is to be shunned by all remaining humanity.
2. Tradesmen
If he can hammer, weld, calibrate, engineer or even just plain dig... jump him. Rebuilding society will take considerable brawn and practical know-how. The good news? Those of us who can cook and garden should, according to my highly-scientific calculations, be the future equivalent of bombshells. Even sewing will be hot.
I'm just taking a stab in the dark here, but who exactly do you think got us into this apocalyptic mess in the first place? I'm pretty sure we should keep politicians off the breeding list.
4. Nerds
If a given nerd manages to survive the chaos of the immediate aftermath, it is safe to say that his stock is sturdy enough to merit mating. Intelligence is highly desirable, but only if the body carrying it does not constitute a liability to the rest of the survivors.
5. Musicians
(See Movie stars, above.)
Notable exception: Keith Richards. We're pretty sure he's some sort of incredibly durable alien, and bringing some of his genetic traits into our race could produce a perpetually ravaged superhuman, with a notable immunity to the effects of sex and drugs.
We've yet to catalog the complete range of males, so please feel free to share your thoughts on professional athletes, sensitive ponytail types, and men who sport tiny, tight swimwear.
Google proves articulate men don’t exist
First off, let’s just address the obvious – Nike must be either totally oblivious or complete geniuses. In marketing we call this ‘knowing your audience’. It’s not until you get to the second line that there is any mention of footwear. Being from the Midwest, we have a very limited amount of time when one actually wears Thongs as footwear – so Thongs mean something totally different to me; and many others I’m sure.
So to see the very first result in Google come up as the Articulate Mens Thong was quite a treat let me tell you. Like there needs to be special thongs for wordy fellows as opposed to the thongs for your average grunting joe? Love it! I hope men of a certain diction enjoy “sliding into something a little more comfortable” each and every day.
Now, on to the fact that the second highest ranking belongs to BlogHer. My inner feminist is relishing in this one. Search for an articulate man and get a website run by women. And not just a site run by women, but the article cited is BY a woman. Thank you Bianca.
So, all of this leads me to believe that Google has just proved the existence of articulate men is--nada. Again, back to my original search; I was expecting to see links to actual men, pictures of them, their posts or sites or media. We all know that Google runs the planet, so if it doesn’t show up here I’m certain it (they) won’t show up anywhere.
Of course I’m sure this post will get flack from all the men out there that would categorize themselves as articulate. I know dears, I’m sure you’re very well spoken given the added confidence gained from the thong. But you have to admit this one is funny.
3.2.10
Supermodel airbrushes labor and delivery
From babycenter.com: Opening up about her bathtub birth, supermodel mom Gisele Bundchen says that her drug-free labor and delivery “didn’t hurt in the slightest.”I like to imagine the real scenario included a lot of profanity, spitting and pummeling (at least until the ultra-exclusive-Supermodel-only-epidural kicked in)... as this lithe creature attempted to pass the equivalent of a football from her uterus into the world. Oh, and Tom Brady? Hiding in the bathroom.
“I wanted to be very aware and present during the birth… I didn’t want to be drugged up,” she says of her son Benjamin’s birth in December. “So I did a lot of preparation, I did yoga and meditation, so I managed to have a very tranquil birth at home. It didn’t hurt in the slightest. The whole time my mind was focused in each contraction on the thought ‘my baby is closer to coming out.”
1.2.10
My slutty pony
Suddenly it struck me: The glossy, made-up eyes... the hint of lip shimmer... the ridiculously long extensions, tossed flirtatiously off to one side... the cheesy tattoo... and yes, the arched back, pushing the perfect little rump a bit higher into the air.
The pony is definitely a slut. Want proof?